If a journalist targets a video game developer by releasing private information with the intent to disrupt the video game developer’s business dealings, and this results in actual disruption and damages, it could potentially be considered tortious interference. The key factors are the intentional nature of the interference, the improper means, and the resulting damages.
The above image shows Nick Calandra admits in Discord to targeting Mark Kern’s business.
Existence of a Valid Contract or Business Relationship: There must be an existing contract or a prospective business relationship between the video game developer and another party.
Knowledge of the Contract or Relationship: The journalist must be aware of the contract or the prospective business relationship.
Intentional Interference: The journalist must have intentionally interfered with the contractual or business relationship.
Improper or Unlawful Means: The interference must be done using improper or unlawful means. Releasing private information could be considered improper, especially if it involves defamation, invasion of privacy, or other illegal activities.
Actual Disruption: The interference must result in a breach of contract or disruption of the business relationship.
Damages: The video game developer must suffer damages as a result of the interference.
The specific details and outcomes would depend on the jurisdiction and the exact nature of the information released and its impact. Consulting with a legal professional would provide a more definitive assessment based on the specific facts of the case.